For law schools, advocacy programs & competition teams
For moot court teams and advocacy programs worldwide: rehearse oral arguments aloud, respond to simulated questions from the bench, and turn structured feedback into a stronger next performance. More reps between coaching sessions. More purpose in every practice.
Built by a practicing U.S. litigator. Selected by BAC University in Malaysia for moot court training. Exploring team pilots with advocacy programs across borders.
COMPETITION SPACE · PILOT ACCESS
Competition Space gives moot court and mock trial teams a focused environment to rehearse oral advocacy using authorized competition materials. Students get more opportunities to respond under pressure; coaches stay in charge of strategy, instruction, and the final judgment.
Preparing for an international moot or a local advocacy competition? We'll confirm your rules on AI use, jurisdiction, language, permitted materials, and supported practice format before recommending a team pilot.
See Competition Space in a demo →Oral performance is our focus. Your team writes the briefs. Your coaches guide the preparation.
SEE COMPETITION SPACE IN ACTION
See how a team can bring authorized competition materials into TrialSim, configure the practice environment, and get more oral-performance reps between coached sessions.
FROM CASE FILE TO BETTER LIVE PRACTICE
Bring the authorized packet, briefs, rules, and team materials.
Keep team preparation grounded in the competition context.
Practice the argument aloud against a responsive simulation.
Identify the next coaching focus, then go again.
TrialSim is not the coach. It helps students arrive with more reps behind them and clearer questions in front of them.
Understanding an argument and delivering it under questioning are different skills. Students need opportunities to practice both preparation and performance.
Faculty and coaches provide essential instruction and judgment. Supplemental practice gives students another place to rehearse before their next supervised session.
Many law students graduate with limited opportunities to perform full examinations under real pressure. They may know what good advocacy looks like without having enough repetitions to make it instinctive.
Students choose a module and practice oral advocacy with AI playing the relevant courtroom roles. Available skills include openings, direct, cross, objections, closings, and appellate argument.
Structured feedback helps students reflect on strengths and opportunities for improvement. They can choose a focus for another attempt and bring questions back to their faculty or coach.
PRESENCE provides a shared vocabulary for reflection across eight dimensions of oral advocacy. Use simulation feedback as a starting point for discussion alongside your program's rubric.
Start with a defined group, practice goal, and evaluation period. Discuss available reporting, faculty access, and support with us before choosing the scope of a pilot.
The PRESENCE rubric was built from the competencies that experienced trial attorneys and clinical educators identify as the difference between adequate advocacy and exceptional advocacy.
Command of the facts, the law, and the strategy before the first word is spoken.
The ability to listen, adapt, and respond to what is actually happening rather than what was planned.
Technical proficiency in the mechanics of examination, objection, and argument.
The voice, presence, and authority that make a jury or judge want to listen.
Reading the room — witness, jury, judge — and adjusting in real time.
Keeping the story coherent under pressure, across every phase of trial.
Understanding the procedural and spatial dynamics of the courtroom as a performance environment.
The competitive instinct that presses an advantage, recovers from a setback, and never loses the thread.
Each dimension is scored independently, producing a profile — not a single number — that shows exactly where a student is developing and exactly where they need work.
01
Choose an available scenario that fits the skill being taught. Have students rehearse before class, then discuss their choices and questions during supervision.
02
Give students a focused practice goal between live sessions. Use their reflections and available simulation feedback to make the next conversation more concrete.
03
Add oral-performance repetitions around scheduled team rehearsals. Confirm the competition's AI rules and the fit of available scenarios before using TrialSim in preparation.
The professor's time becomes more strategic. TrialSim handles the repetitions. You handle the development.
Student performance information is handled under TrialSim's privacy and institutional access controls. Faculty visibility can be configured for the program and limited according to applicable permissions.
Case materials and student data are handled under TrialSim's security and privacy controls. We work with institutional partners to define appropriate access and data-handling expectations before deployment.
TrialSim does not sell student performance data. Data handling, service-provider access, and AI-related processing are governed by our privacy, security, and institutional terms.
Tell us about your students, the skill they need to practice, and your program's timeline. Together, we can assess whether a focused pilot makes sense.
Book 15 minutes to see the relevant modules, Competition Space, and how TrialSim can add purposeful reps between your live coaching sessions.
15 MINUTES · BUILT AROUND YOUR PROGRAM
We’ll show the relevant advocacy modules, Competition Space, and a practical pilot path for your clinic, course, moot court, or mock trial team.
Discuss a Team Pilot →Prefer email? Reach us at founder@trialsim.io.